Treatment of Guillain-Barre Syndrome 01
Topic: Adult
Created on Friday, October 3 2008 by jdmiles
Last modified on Friday, October 3 2008.
A patient presents with a 2 day history of worsening symmetric weakness. She states that the weakness began in the lower extremities, and now involves the upper extremities as well. Exam is normal except for notably decreased strength throughout, and absent reflexes. CSF is colorless, and shows no cells, elevated protein, and normal glucose.
You decide to initiate treatment.
Of the following options, which statement regarding treatment of this patient's disorder is most accurate?
A) IVIG is more effective than plasmapheresis, and has fewer side effects B) Plasmapheresis is more effective than IVIG, and there is no significant difference in side effects C) Plasmapheresis is more effective than IVIG, but has more side effects D) IVIG is more effective than plasmapheresis, and there is no significant difference in side effects E) IVIG is more effective than corticosteroids.
This question was created on October 03, 2008 by jdmiles.
This question was last modified on October 03, 2008.
ANSWERS AND EXPLANATIONS
A) IVIG is more effective than plasmapheresis, and has fewer side effects
This answer is incorrect.
The patient has Guillain-Barre syndrome (GBS). In the treatment of GBS, IVIG and plasmapheresis are both more effective than corticosteroids. There is no clear difference in efficacy between IVIG and plasmapheresis, but IVIG has fewer side effects. (
See References)
|
| | |
| | |
Please log in if you want to rate questions. |
B) Plasmapheresis is more effective than IVIG, and there is no significant difference in side effects
This answer is incorrect.
The patient has Guillain-Barre syndrome (GBS). In the treatment of GBS, IVIG and plasmapheresis are both more effective than corticosteroids. There is no clear difference in efficacy between IVIG and plasmapheresis, but IVIG has fewer side effects. (
See References)
|
| | |
| | |
Please log in if you want to rate questions. |
C) Plasmapheresis is more effective than IVIG, but has more side effects
This answer is incorrect.
The patient has Guillain-Barre syndrome (GBS). In the treatment of GBS, IVIG and plasmapheresis are both more effective than corticosteroids. There is no clear difference in efficacy between IVIG and plasmapheresis, but IVIG has fewer side effects. (
See References)
|
| | |
| | |
Please log in if you want to rate questions. |
D) IVIG is more effective than plasmapheresis, and there is no significant difference in side effects
This answer is incorrect.
The patient has Guillain-Barre syndrome (GBS). In the treatment of GBS, IVIG and plasmapheresis are both more effective than corticosteroids. There is no clear difference in efficacy between IVIG and plasmapheresis, but IVIG has fewer side effects. (
See References)
|
| | |
| | |
Please log in if you want to rate questions. |
E) IVIG is more effective than corticosteroids.
This answer is correct.
The patient has Guillain-Barre syndrome (GBS). In the treatment of GBS, IVIG and plasmapheresis are both more effective than corticosteroids. There is no clear difference in efficacy between IVIG and plasmapheresis, but IVIG has fewer side effects. (
See References)
|
| | |
| | |
Please log in if you want to rate questions. |
References:
1. Winer, J.B. (2002). "Treatment of Guillain-Barré syndrome." QJM, 95(11) 717-21. (PMID:12391383) | |
|
| | |
| | |
Please log in if you want to rate questions. |
FrontalCortex.com -- Neurology Review Questions -- Neurology Boards -- Board Review -- Residency Inservice Training Exam -- RITE Exam Review
adult
Treatment of Guillain-Barre Syndrome 01
Question ID: 100308124
Question written by J. Douglas Miles, (C) 2006-2009, all rights reserved.
Created: 10/03/2008
Modified: 10/03/2008
Estimated Permutations: 75600